|
Brady Campaign And Lautenberg Unite To Mislead And Control--Again
This week, in a typically misleading move designed to bolster their political agenda rather than reduce violent crime, the Brady Campaign released a report calling for background checks on "all gun sales in America, including at gun shows." The Brady report was intentionally designed to correspond with, and bolster, a "gun show loophole" bill (S. 843) introduced this week by fanatical anti-gun Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ). In fact, the Brady report was released at the press conference Lautenberg held earlier this week.
Paul Helmke, President of the Brady Campaign, said in the group's press release, "We can do this. It will have no impact on any law-abiding gun owner in the country." Of course, that is absolutely false-the proposal will ONLY impact law-abiding gun owners, including any law-abiding person selling a firearm to a law-abiding buyer. Does Helmke really think that criminals, drug cartel members, and violent gang thugs are going to start legally purchasing firearms and submitting to a background check? Law-breakers, by definition, break the law. They are criminals; they are predatory, they operate outside of the law. You know that, we know that, Lautenberg knows that, even Helmke knows that.
|
Comment by jim— 2009/04/27 @ 03:30 PM — (Reply)
Comment by jim— 2009/04/27 @ 03:31 PM — (Reply)
Comment by Ed— 2009/04/27 @ 04:00 PM — (Reply)
Comment by jim— 2009/04/27 @ 04:38 PM — (Reply)
Comment by riffran— 2009/04/28 @ 03:44 AM — (Reply)
Comment by Ed— 2009/04/28 @ 03:59 AM — (Reply)
Comment by riffran— 2009/04/28 @ 06:19 AM — (Reply)
Comment by jim— 2009/04/28 @ 06:10 AM — (Reply)
Comment by jim— 2009/04/28 @ 06:14 AM — (Reply)
Comment by aza spade— 2009/04/28 @ 08:58 AM — (Reply)
BG
Comment by Barry G.— 2009/04/28 @ 04:07 PM — (Reply)
I personally have not had the courtesy of a response from them re: their wrongful banning of the "wit" who mocks the so called "skank" so effectively. Have any of you? I also don't understand how the "wit" can still comment with a banned blog. I admit that I often ENJOY the "wit's" commentary.
Comment by Ed— 2009/04/28 @ 04:19 PM — (Reply)